Say this about "What They Died For," the final penultimate episode of Lost ever: It was much better than "Across the Sea." And while that might sound like faint praise — since, hey, that episode sucked — it's important because it shows that Lost will not go quietly into the night, shuffling off like some heinous SyFy series. Not that any rational viewer was ready to throw in the towel after one bad episode.
Still, there were some problems.
Any episode that largely features Michael Emerson is — by my count — very good. It's saying something that on this late date, Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse chose to give Ben Linus so much to do — this wasn't a Ben-centric episode, but it sure felt like one. But where "What They Died For" stumbled, among other places, was in his about-face change of character. Remember when Ben Linus became the "good guy" for a spell this season? Because apparently no one writing the show does. And his switch back to Ben Linus v.1 felt abrupt, rushed and unearned, even if it was awesome. Now, you can chalk that up to one of two things: More lousy season six character writing or one final con from the Island's master manipulator. But after the way things have gone during the later part of this season, forgive me for thinking it's the former.
The strengths of "What They Died For" aside, the biggest disappointment during the final episodes of Lost has been the writing. And it's not that Lindelof and Cuse have stopped concentrating on "characters that we know" — a refrain I've been hammering for quite some time (see: "Ab Aeterno" and "Across the Sea") — it's that they've gotten lazy. Instead of creating believable motivations for these characters we've come to know and love, they've had them do things just because. It's almost a variation on the entire mythology of "Across the Sea:" Why is [insert random choice here] happening? Because Lindelof and Cuse said so.
And so we get Ben Linus flipping allegiances once again. We get Hurley going from gung-ho leader just a few days ago in show time to wimpy follower, breathing a sigh of relief when Jack volunteered to be New Jacob. And on and on. And we're just supposed to believe these things would happen because Ben is Ben and Hurley is Hurley. That's fine; but there was a time when Lost took the time to develop things (just look at how Ben was originally introduced in season two). They had an entire season to accomplish the development that could have made "What They Died For" that much better. Instead they wasted precious time and had to rush things. Too bad.
Anyway, more to discuss. Lightning round!
1.) Let's start with the title. "What They Died For." Jacob promised to tell the Final Four what Sun, Jin and Sayid had died for. Only, no. He must have forgot. Though I guess "thinning the herd" is not a reason Jacob felt comfortable giving.
1a.) I loved the reasoning behind Jacob crossing Kate's name off the list. She was a mother and, thus, had someone in her life. "It's just a line of chalk on the wall." Win!
1b.) Of course Jin and Sun had each other and Sun was a mother, so they should have been crossed off too. This is the part where I'm supposed to remind you that the Kwon on the cave wall was probably Ji-Yeon, but at this point, I don't know if Lost has enough time to make that come true. Again, too much time wasted.
1c.) Jack becoming New Jacob is something we all thought was going to happen forever. Of course Jack would become New Jacob; he likes to fix things and the Island needs a-fixin'. I still think there was value in having Hurley take the Island reigns, but maybe in another life. Though if watching television has taught me anything, it's that Hurley's sigh of relief could have been foreshadowing to him ultimately taking over. I know that contradicts one of my issues with "What They Died For," but in this case, I'll be happy to be wrong.
1d.) Again, not to crap all over this Emily Nussbaum-style, but: Jacob's entire reasoning for bringing everyone to the Island felt a bit flawed. Because he screwed up by turning his brother into the smoke monster, he dragged all the Oceanic 815 losers to the Island and groomed them to be his successor? Talk about selfish and chess match-y. And we're to believe, upon hearing that reason, no one in the Final Four was like, "Hey, you're a dick?" Sure, Jacob proved that Locke was right all those times — they were brought there for a reason — but that reason was basically nonsense.
1e.) Also: I love how Jacob told the Final Four that he wanted them to have free will to chose their destiny. But if no one stepped up, the world was going to end. Uh, last time I checked, being threatened into a decision doesn't count as free will.
1f.) Now that Jack drank the blessed creek water, does that mean he's an immortal like Jacob and Richard? To pull a Sawyer: And you thought that guy had a God-complex before...
2.) Not to harp on "Across the Sea," but, again, that episode wasn't necessary to make "What They Died For" understandable. Jacob explained everything that happened in that episode — beyond his "Mother" — to the Final Four. Did knowing that the source of light at the center of the Island looked like the contents of Marcellus Wallace's briefcase really enhance your pleasure during those informational download scenes? No, it didn't.
3.) Now to Widmore, another functional prop sans character. Jacob brought him to the Island to bring Desmond. Okay, long way around on that one — why did Jacob need a middleman? — but fine. Widmore was told that Desmond was a fail-safe device, which I'll take to mean that if Flocke succeeded in killing everyone, Desmond could reset things because of his special, trans-reality powers. Again, that's cool. But why did we need Widmore there other than to provide some major red herrings and the chance to watch Ben exact some revenge?
3a.) That said, I literally applauded when Ben shot Widmore. Good, great, awesome. That bastard deserved to get his comeuppance, and no amount of love for The O.C. (Caleb Nichol for life!) would ever change my mind. I'm literally gleeful that Ben murdered him.
3b.) Another great death: Zoe. As Flocke said, she was "pointless."
3c.) A bad death, if it was truly a death: Richard. That's it? Run into by the freight train known as the smoke monster? That better not be the last of him. It's one thing for Lindelof and Cuse to kill off Frank Lapidus like that; it's quite another to kill off Richard Alpert.
3d.) Wrapping up New Otherton: I loved Ben just sitting on the porch waiting for Flocke; I didn't love Miles just running out the back. Add him onto the list of Lost characters with potential for greatness but who have no actual use on the show.
3e.) This is important and probably shows that Ben is playing Flocke: Flocke promised Ben the Island to get him to join Team Flocke. Then Flocke said he was going to destroy the Island. So why would Ben still want to hang out with him? Yeah, he wouldn't.
3f.) Fun fact: The penultimate episode in season four ended with Locke saying he was going to move the Island. My how the times have changed.
4.) Sideways universe! You could call the Desmond Summit at the Los Angeles County jail contrived, but I'll just call it awesome. Remember in the beginning of the season how it was fun to see the actors get to play little variations on their past characters? And how that's been largely ignored during the latter stages? Well Henry Ian Cusick is giving us a totally different Desmond in the alternate reality and it's just wonderful to watch. He's so mischievous and fun! I could probably watch him scheme all day long.
4a.) Another thing I'll miss about the flash-sideways: Hurley's blunt reactions. Like saying hello to Ana Lucia and remembering that she wouldn't know him.
5.) So the flash-sideways conceit and reveal is going to happen during the Lost family reunion at the concert. Great and good. This is also where we'll find out that Jack's ex-wife is Juliet. Because, obviously.
6.) Now, if Desmond is the fail-safe, does this mean that Lost will really reset itself at the end of the series? If I were a betting man, I'd say yes. And I'd say the series will end with Jack's eye opening up. The show will close the loop and come full circle. And if that does happen, I won't be mad. In fact, nothing short of total and unwatchable disaster on Sunday could make me hate this series as a whole. It's given me more entertainment than anything over the last decade. Or at least since The Sopranos has gone off the air. Any predictions on your end?
One episode left, ever. Let's. Do. This.

Going to miss your recaps- I agree this was a decent if flawed episode. We share the obsession of how bad "across the sea" was. It was so bad it literally distracted me while watching this episode. At least three or four times during this episode I resented/lamented the time wasted last week.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed this episode especially after last week's shameful display of bullshit. I thought the acting was top notch (Terry o'quinn, holy shit!) this time around, and the episode of as a whole was very well produced and just flat out looked great and felt right. The pacing was great, and I loved how they finally got back to Ben.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with you about Ben, Hurley and character's motivations. I thought the small glimpses of change they displayed in this season had felt rushed and untrue to their characters. Yes people change, but at their core they are still the same. I never once believed that Ben still didn't have a vindictive and manipulative side to him. Last night was 100% Ben and why we have all grown to love and loathe him at the same time. I think Ben's character really came full circle last night. Ben has severe daddy issues and always wanted someone to love him. He was verbally abused and neglected by his dad on the island, never had a mom, and failed as a father himself when his daughter was murdered. I think he thought of Jacob as a father and felt betrayed when he realized Jacob communicated with Widmore and not him. And then in the alt reality he is told he is viewed as a father figure, and finally gets to fill that void again. I loved it all, and was really happy seeing Ben's character finally followed through like that. As for Hurley being a leader and then following Jack..that has always been Hurley. He's unsure of himself and has always been afraid of making a poor decision that will end up hurting people. And after the sub blew up and thy all barely survived, I think nobody aside from Jack had the strength to be a leader anymore. It made total sense to me.
With that being said, I can't agree with you more about what you said in 1d.) The whole reasoning for them being there seems beyond pointless and meaningless. I'm sure we'll get more insight on Sunday, but still, Jacob's motivations should have been thought out better by the writers. They should have been taking time with the Jacob story since season 3. That is my biggest complaint about the show and this season. The Jacob/candidate thing has become so important to the show and it almost feels like they should have just never mentioned it in the first place.
My thoughts on the end? I think Jack will def be a short lived "protector" and probably the last. He'll sacrifice himself or die in some way. I'm hoping Smoke actually does get off the island and we see a glimpse of the horror that brings with it. And then Desmond saves the day and everything resets. Or something.
Also wanted to say great job on that Lost Snowglobe article and all of these recaps. They're really fun to read and always thought provoking. So thanks!
ReplyDeleteOh and, I liked the way Richard was disposed of. It was like when Steven Segal dies in Executive Decision. Richard was all sure of himself saying "I know this man, he'll talk to me." Bullshit, Richard. Smoke is done with you and so is the island. I thought it felt realistic (within the context of the show of course) and I hope they leave it that way.
ReplyDeleteAre we sure Richard is dead? I thought Jacob made Richard immortal? We didn't actually see a dead Richard.
ReplyDeleteWith good episodes come good fodder. So much to point out.
ReplyDeleteI think you nailed it on 1b) with why Sun and Jin were released and the other Kwon being the candidate. However, who cares? We dont even know him? Do we care?
About 3a) Why could Ben kill Widmore? Wasnt there a rule about them not killing each other? When Ben showed up to Widmores flat a few seasons ago, he couldnt do it... I assume this will be left to our assumptions.
About 3d) Miles running into the forest. He's now the only one who hasnt spoken to Locke (bye bye Zoe) so he will be the one to kill him or die trying.
About 5) The side-flash reunion, def gonna be Juliet, who will see Sawyer, and they will click back. I think the same with Jack and Kate. Just wondering how we'll get Claire and Charlie in the same room or Charlotte and Daniel.
Has anyone seen Rose and Bernard? Seriously.
Chris,
ReplyDeleteOur opinions are syncing up like women's menstrual cycles. (I think i said the "just becase" thing last week).
The flip-flopping Ben, awful. I sense some dissappointment with the writers finally, am I correct?
The ending I think you're right on. I've thought that for awhile now because of outside things I've read (books) that they are blatantly inspired, derived, stealing from. I can't say what cause Poppycock is on here and as a friend I do not want to spoil things for him. But for it to come full circle and begin how it started made the most sense to me, and you validating is great.
I simply agree with everything else you said. (Don't have much more to say, I'm lost theoried out and will be happy when this is over.)
I had a revelation last night. This show has been good. Really good. Entertaining. But when it first started out, and for the first 5 seasons I was lead to believe that there was a deeper meaning, and that all this symbolism was going somewhere; along with the characters I truly had faith that this was going to change television because it'd be like true literature. It's obviously not going to be that way, because a lot has amounted to mean nothing (it's just chalk on a wall). So really, I'm at fault for thinking this show was something they never intended it to be. They wanted write a mysterious, entertaing show. They didn't want to make a statement raelly about anything, just wanted to entertain. Which is fine, it's my fault for thinking it could be more.
The girlfriend made a great point last night. I asked her if she thought this show was "great" (I should tell you she has watched every episode in the past 4 months, thus has a different perspective which is really interesting how much it differs from some one who's watched from the beginning). She said, yes it is a great show, because she could show it to her students and it would teach them to think outside the box and develop their critical thinking. Isn't that all this show has really done? Gotten the mass audience to finally start thinking critcally? I mean you hear random people, who sound like morons, coming up with general thoughts on Jacob being like Jesus/God, and thinking their really smart for making that connection. It's something that we could write off and say, "Yea, we already knew that but what is the purpose of that symbolism? What are they trying to say?", but apparently...they're not going to say anything. They just wanted people to start thinking. Lost is really a teaching tool for art, for picking up on the basics, like character development, sympolism, personification, irony, etc. For that...I think this show is great. I'm not the target they were going for (elitest, pretentious wanting a larger statement).
So in short, I won't condemn it, but I'm not going to praise it or continue discussing my thoughts on what things mean, because they've said to the audience numerous times now, "Stop it doesn't matter."
I'll see this to the end, because to stop it'd be like dating some one for 6 years and the girl telling you to just forget about them. I can't!
Final thought: it's weird to think that in a matter of 5 days, you and I won't have anything to talk about it. Not only is Lost ending, but it is ending a lot of people's common thread together. The biggest examplee, you and me. It's sad in a weird way, and maybe that's what we should really take a way from this show. We spend so much time in isolation in our daily lives, that we should take some time and look up and talk to people we wouldn't normally. Otherwise, we'll end up on an island because some one thinks we're lonely.
Hi, I'm also going to miss your blog, I think it's the best one I have been reading!
ReplyDeleteAlthough one slight quibble, I don't agree that Jacob saying that Kate could still be the protector of the island and it was just a line of chalk was a good thing. We have spent a whole series following the candidates and to find out that that doesn't really mean anything and anyone can do the job is a little disappointing.
Also Sawyer has a kid, as do Jin and Sun so why were they still on the list? I thought this reveal why kate was not a candidate would be a lot more rewarding!
Absolutely loved watching Locke and Ben sitting on the porch together and Henry Ian Cusick is a legend!! LOVE HIM! xxx
@Ellie and everyone: While the Lost recaps will be ending, I'll still try to post much more on the blog. Believe me, I'm not shutting this down. It's the portal for all my other writing at Movieline, the Observer, New York, etc. So keep me bookmarked and keep coming by!
ReplyDeleteAs for your point: You are absolutely right about Jacob and Kate. While I did love the simplicity of that reveal, it was just another reveal that led to more questions that Lindelof and Cuse weren't prepared to answer. It's like they're just creating plot holes for the sake of plot holes.